Feat: inline functions #35
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Inline functions will give the developer the power to make small programs even cheaper to be deployed. If all functions are inline and called just once, then no need to spend a "code stack page" to control the function calls addresses, the assembly will be a monolithic piece of code.
For regular programs, using the inline function can spare just two step fees (JSR and RET) and for really small functions it is still better to create a macro with arguments (substitution during code preprocessor).
Using inline can also make harder to reverse the program logic, because the functions will not be trivial to find.