generated from dbt-labs/dbt-oss-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
* add adr * expand on single maintainer * wording tweaks * Update docs/arch/adr-0001-build-tooling.md
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
80 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ | ||
# Build Tool | ||
|
||
|
||
## Context | ||
|
||
We need to select a build tool for managing dependencies for, building, and distributing `dbt-common`. While tooling can vary, this repo can serve as an OSS template for other OSS at dbt Labs and beyond. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Options | ||
|
||
- `setuptools` (`twine`, `build`) | ||
- `hatch` | ||
- `poetry` | ||
|
||
|
||
### setuptools | ||
|
||
#### Pro's | ||
|
||
- most popular option | ||
- supported by Python Packaging Authority | ||
- build tool of record for dbt-core & existing internal adapters | ||
|
||
#### Con's | ||
|
||
- less flexible; forced to support backwards compatibility more so than other options | ||
- no dependency management (manually add to `pyproject.toml`) | ||
|
||
|
||
### hatch | ||
|
||
#### Pro's | ||
|
||
- supported by Python Packaging Authority | ||
- already used by `dbt-semantic-layer` and `internal-actions` | ||
- supports running tests against multiple versions of python locally (same functionality as `tox`) | ||
- supports configuring workflows in `pyproject.toml` (same functionality as `make`) | ||
- incorporates new PEP's quickly | ||
- Manages python distributions itself without need of pyenv. This allows Windows and non-Windows users to both work locally in the same way. | ||
- used by black, tox, pipx, Jupyter Notebook, Datadog | ||
|
||
#### Con's | ||
|
||
- far less popular than other options | ||
- no dependency management (manually add to `pyproject.toml`) | ||
- only one maintainer (but is officially part of the larger PyPA working group) | ||
- Hatch does not allow for the installation of specific patch release versions of itself but rather only uses minor release granularity that tracks the latest patch release | ||
|
||
|
||
### poetry | ||
|
||
#### Pro's | ||
|
||
- second most popular option, similar in popularity to `setuptools` | ||
- dependency management (`poetry add "my-dependency"`) | ||
- provides a lock file | ||
- more than one maintainer | ||
|
||
#### Con's | ||
|
||
- incorporates new PEP's slowly | ||
|
||
|
||
## Decision | ||
|
||
#### Selected: `hatch` | ||
|
||
This option aligns with `dbt-adapter` and `dbt-semantic-layer`, which minimizes confusion | ||
for anyone working in multiple repositories. | ||
`hatch` also replaces `tox` and `make`, which consolidates our toolset to make working locally and with CI more consistant. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Consequences | ||
|
||
- [+] retire `tox` | ||
- [+] retire `make` | ||
- [+] rewriting the release workflows will create a more intuitive release for hatch projects | ||
- [-] we cannot reuse the existing release workflows | ||
- [-] write more detailed docs given lower familiarity | ||
- [-] learning curve |