Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use dcicpyvcf version 3 (C4-1106) #756

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

netsettler
Copy link
Contributor

This is intended as a branch-to-branch PR affecting cgap-portal PR #754 on branch upgrade-python-20230925.

The only proposed changes are to the dcicpyvcf version in pyproject.toml, adjusting it from 1.0.0.1b0 to 3.0.0a4 in order to test that out. It tests cleanly in Python 3.8.16 on my local machine and this will test it in Python 11. If this test is successful, we plan to release that dcicpyvcf version as 3.0.0, and I'll adjust that in this PR before we merge it (if this gets approved).

The actual change is tiny, just that one line in pyproject.toml and a corresponding invocation of poetry update dcicpyvcf causing a change to poetry.lock. But right now I'm showing the PR as merging to master so that I can get easy testing and so it will look like a lot more files are changed, only because those files are changed in David's underlying branch (upgrade-python-20230925).

@netsettler netsettler changed the base branch from master to upgrade-python-20230925 October 5, 2023 06:34
Copy link
Contributor

@willronchetti willronchetti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs version bump but should be fine

…csnovault in pyproject.toml, and then update poetry.lock to agree.
@netsettler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Needs version bump but should be fine

It's a layered PR, so doesn't need a version bump.

@netsettler netsettler merged commit ccea5c0 into upgrade-python-20230925 Oct 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants