Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump nanoid from 3.3.7 to 3.3.8 in /frontend #1743

Closed

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 15, 2024

Bumps nanoid from 3.3.7 to 3.3.8.

Changelog

Sourced from nanoid's changelog.

3.3.8

  • Fixed a way to break Nano ID by passing non-integer size (by @​myndzi).
Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [nanoid](https://github.com/ai/nanoid) from 3.3.7 to 3.3.8.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/ai/nanoid/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/ai/nanoid/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](ai/nanoid@3.3.7...3.3.8)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: nanoid
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Dec 15, 2024
@noah-paige
Copy link
Contributor

PR to resolve at #1745

@dlpzx
Copy link
Contributor

dlpzx commented Dec 19, 2024

Close in favor of #1745

@dlpzx dlpzx closed this Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 19, 2024

OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting @dependabot ignore this major version or @dependabot ignore this minor version.

If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it.

@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/frontend/nanoid-3.3.8 branch December 19, 2024 09:52
noah-paige added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
### Feature or Bugfix
<!-- please choose -->
- Bugfix

### Detail
- Bump deps for `nanoid` and `path-to-regexp` npm packages
- remove `with:` arg in Snyk Workflow for weekly runs

### Relates
- #1743

### Security
Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
`N/A`. Based on
[OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/).

- Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this
includes
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an
S3 bucket)?
  - Is the input sanitized?
- What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you
consume?
  - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
  - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used?
- Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires
authorization?
- How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
  - Are you logging failed auth attempts?
- Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
  - Do you use a standard proven implementations?
  - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
- Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
  - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
dlpzx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2024
<!-- please choose -->
- Bugfix

- Bump deps for `nanoid` and `path-to-regexp` npm packages
- remove `with:` arg in Snyk Workflow for weekly runs

- #1743

Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
`N/A`. Based on
[OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/).

- Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this
includes
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an
S3 bucket)?
  - Is the input sanitized?
- What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you
consume?
  - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
  - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used?
- Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires
authorization?
- How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
  - Are you logging failed auth attempts?
- Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
  - Do you use a standard proven implementations?
  - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
- Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
  - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants