Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added permission check - is tenant to update SSM parameters API #1714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

dlpzx
Copy link
Contributor

@dlpzx dlpzx commented Nov 22, 2024

Feature or Bugfix

  • Feature

Detail

  • Added service function and check if the user is a tenant for the updateSSM API call

Relates

Security

Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write N/A. Based on
OWASP 10.

  • Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes
    fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)?
    • Is the input sanitized?
    • What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume?
    • Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
    • Have you ensured no eval or similar functions are used?
  • Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization?
    • How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
    • Are you logging failed auth attempts?
  • Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
    • Do you use a standard proven implementations?
    • Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
  • Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
    • Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@@ -121,6 +123,26 @@ def validate_permissions(session, tenant_name, g_permissions, group):
return tenant_group_permissions


class TenantActionsService:
@staticmethod
def update_monitoring_ssm_parameter(name, value):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we keeping this API or removing this along with other Admin Dashboard ones?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines +137 to +142
response = ParameterStoreManager.update_parameter(
AwsAccountId=current_account,
region=region,
parameter_name=f'/dataall/{os.getenv("envname", "local")}/quicksightmonitoring/{name}',
parameter_value=value,
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know this is carry over from resolver code - but this does not work...

All of the following use ParameterStore and try to assume into pivotRole in infra account to get SSM (pivot role DNE in infra account)
createQuicksightDataSourceSet,
getMonitoringDashboardId,
getMonitoringVPCConnectionId,
updateSSMParameter

Will approve this PR but leave this comment in https://github.com/data-dot-all/dataall/pull/1712/files where I think more focus is on QuickSight Monitoring View

@dlpzx dlpzx merged commit 0215cc0 into main Nov 25, 2024
9 checks passed
@dlpzx dlpzx mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2024
dlpzx added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
### Feature or Bugfix
- Feature

### Detail
- Added service function and check if the user is a tenant for the
updateSSM API call

### Relates
- <URL or Ticket>

### Security
Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
`N/A`. Based on
[OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/).

- Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this
includes
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an
S3 bucket)?
  - Is the input sanitized?
- What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you
consume?
  - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
  - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used?
- Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires
authorization?
- How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
  - Are you logging failed auth attempts?
- Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
  - Do you use a standard proven implementations?
  - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
- Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
  - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
@dlpzx dlpzx mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants