-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Snyk Workflow to Find Project Deps #1708
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dlpzx
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2024
petrkalos
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2024
Merged
dlpzx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
### Feature or Bugfix <!-- please choose --> ### Detail - Change GitHub Action step from using `snyk/actions/python-3.9@master` to `snyk/actions/setup@master` - `snyk/actions/setup@master` will just install Snyk CLI and we add step to explicitly call `snyk test ...` with our arguments - Changed because `snyk/actions/python-3.9@master` was setting up some virtual env and not finding the installed dependencies from `make install` (leading to Snyk skipping over the checks on `requirements.txt`) - Alternatives Explored - Specifying `package-manager` to pip rather than poetry (Poetry shell was being created that did not carry over installed deps from before using `snyk/actions/python-3.9@master`) - But not supported with `all-projects` flag - Adding configuration to `pyproject.toml` to prevent venv creation (could not find a working solution) - Using venvs and exporting PATH env variable to be used later by Snyk action step (could not find a working solution) ### Relates - #1708 ### Security Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
dlpzx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2024
### Feature or Bugfix <!-- please choose --> - Bugfix ### Detail - Add args `--all-projects --detection-depth=5` for Snyk to find project Dep - Add MakeFile command to install all Python Deps before running `snyk test` - Noted as a requirement in [Snyk Docs](https://docs.snyk.io/scm-ide-and-ci-cd-integrations/snyk-ci-cd-integrations/github-actions-for-snyk-setup-and-checking-for-vulnerabilities/snyk-python-action) ### Relates - <URL or Ticket> ### Security Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
dlpzx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2024
### Feature or Bugfix <!-- please choose --> ### Detail - Change GitHub Action step from using `snyk/actions/python-3.9@master` to `snyk/actions/setup@master` - `snyk/actions/setup@master` will just install Snyk CLI and we add step to explicitly call `snyk test ...` with our arguments - Changed because `snyk/actions/python-3.9@master` was setting up some virtual env and not finding the installed dependencies from `make install` (leading to Snyk skipping over the checks on `requirements.txt`) - Alternatives Explored - Specifying `package-manager` to pip rather than poetry (Poetry shell was being created that did not carry over installed deps from before using `snyk/actions/python-3.9@master`) - But not supported with `all-projects` flag - Adding configuration to `pyproject.toml` to prevent venv creation (could not find a working solution) - Using venvs and exporting PATH env variable to be used later by Snyk action step (could not find a working solution) ### Relates - #1708 ### Security Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feature or Bugfix
Detail
--all-projects --detection-depth=5
for Snyk to find project Depsnyk test
Relates
Security
Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write
N/A
. Based onOWASP 10.
fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)?
eval
or similar functions are used?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.