Skip to content

Update dependency @types/chrome to ^0.0.287 #210

Update dependency @types/chrome to ^0.0.287

Update dependency @types/chrome to ^0.0.287 #210

Triggered via pull request February 4, 2024 11:21
Status Success
Total duration 35s
Artifacts

node.js.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

14 warnings
build (16.x)
Node.js 16 actions are deprecated. Please update the following actions to use Node.js 20: actions/checkout@v3, actions/setup-node@v3. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-09-22-github-actions-transitioning-from-node-16-to-node-20/.
build (16.x): background-script.js#L107
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): background-script.js#L166
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): background-script.js#L173
["tabPosition"] is better written in dot notation
build (16.x): background-script.js#L182
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): content-script.js#L30
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): content-script.js#L31
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x)
Node.js 16 actions are deprecated. Please update the following actions to use Node.js 20: actions/checkout@v3, actions/setup-node@v3. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-09-22-github-actions-transitioning-from-node-16-to-node-20/.
build (18.x): background-script.js#L107
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): background-script.js#L166
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): background-script.js#L173
["tabPosition"] is better written in dot notation
build (18.x): background-script.js#L182
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): content-script.js#L30
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): content-script.js#L31
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read