implement random a/d buypol in storage

[nuclearkatie]

Requires cyclus#1634 to be merged first! (merged 1/17/24). Note that cyclus#1634 breaks cycamore storage because it changes the active dormant API. Until this PR is merged, the current cycamore/main storage archetype will not work with cyclus/main!

Closes #553 and #555

This PR makes the full range of fixed and random active and dormant and size buying behaviors available to Storage. To do so, it introduces a type and five numeric values each for the active frequency, dormant frequency, and request size (18 new parameters total).

Testing included

[nuclearkatie]

@gonuke merged in the line from #570. Unfortunately, now there's a new CI error when it goes to run the cycamore python tests (the unit tests pass now):
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cyclus'

[gonuke]

@bennibbelink - can you shed any light on why we aren't finding the cyclus python module on the most recent image? I'm not longer sure which CI path generated the image.

[bennibbelink]

I found the issue, it has to do with the way we are finding the site-packages directory in the cycamore workflow (which is broken now that we don't build cyclus as an egg). I fixed it in this PR, but I can make it a separate PR to follow best practices.

Also... the fix is still a little hacky. I will try to find a more robust solution

[bennibbelink]

Tried to make a different PR but realized that CI won't pass without the changes you've added here, so I think it's best to just include this fix in this PR. I modified it to be a bit more robust than it was before

[nuclearkatie]

Thanks @bennibbelink !

[gonuke]

A few additional comments here now that I look at the state variables carefully, with their comments

[nuclearkatie]

@gonuke I think I addressed all your comments

[abachma2]

Hi @nuclearkatie. This looks pretty good overall, and it looks like you addressed @gonuke's comments, from what I could see. I have a few more comments for you, mostly for my understanding.

[gonuke]

One really small change - I really didn't want to delay further, but it's driven by our code readability standards.

[gonuke]

Thanks for this great addition @nuclearkatie