Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sync master <> dev #555

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 22, 2024
Merged

sync master <> dev #555

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

0xalpharush
Copy link
Contributor

@0xalpharush 0xalpharush commented Mar 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub workflow to enhance Python setup, dependency installation, and test execution.
  • Refactor
    • Modified convert_filename function for better path compatibility with recent Solidity compiler updates.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing compatibility and functionality. The Python workflow has been refined for better efficiency in testing, while adjustments in the Solidity compiler compatibility ensure smoother path comparisons. These changes aim to streamline development processes and improve code quality across different environments.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/pytest.yml Updated Python setup, dependency installation, and test execution steps for efficiency.
crytic_compile/utils/naming.py Modified to use as_posix() for path comparison, ensuring compatibility with Solidity 0.8.8.

Related issues

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Paths and tests, they never stop.
🌟 With each commit, a leap so bold,
In Python's warmth and Solidity's cold.
Together we fix, together we build,
A garden of code, with joy fulfilled.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@0xalpharush 0xalpharush added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit b5c538a Mar 22, 2024
168 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62c55fe and 9e23fdc.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • tests/call_to_variable-all.sol-0.5.8-legacy.zip is excluded by: !**/*.zip
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/pytest.yml (1 hunks)
  • crytic_compile/utils/naming.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
.github/workflows/pytest.yml (3)
  • 29-35: The Python setup and caching configuration look good. Ensure that setup.py exists and is correctly configured to leverage pip caching effectively.
  • 38-41: The dependency installation steps are appropriate. Consider removing --always-install from the solc-select use latest command to avoid unnecessary installations if the latest version is already present.
  • 43-45: Running tests with pytest is standard practice. Consider exploring additional pytest flags for parallel execution (-n) or detailed reporting (--durations=10) if not already considered.
crytic_compile/utils/naming.py (1)
  • 191-197: The use of as_posix() for path normalization is a good practice for cross-platform compatibility and aligns with Solidity compiler version 0.8.8 changes. Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using as_posix(), to aid future maintainers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant