-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add memoization to toFHIRObject #44
Open
mrnosal
wants to merge
1
commit into
cqframework:master
Choose a base branch
from
mrnosal:memoize-fhir-object
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This key can likely get quite large since it's stringifying the passed in
data
,typeSpecifier
,modelInfo
, andsuffix
.In particular, I thought
modelInfo
was going to be a big problem because themodelInfo
is quite large with several duplicative maps in it -- but running it through the debugger, I see thatJSON.stringify
converts all those huge Maps into empty objects ({ }
), which turns out to be helpful for us. Still,modelInfo
should be static and identifiable by itsurl
andversion
-- so we could update the key to only use that instead of the wholemodelInfo
. Of course then this is no longer a fully generic memoization function, as it would need to be type-aware.I'm not sure how to get around the problem when
data
is huge though (for example, if this were being called on a FHIR Bundle with hundreds of embedded resources). In theory, if thedata
is a resource, then theresourceType
/id
combination would usually be unique, but there could be extreme edge cases where maybe that's not the case.Might it make sense to hash the big string and use the hash as the key? I don't remember how expensive a hash operation is though, so I'm not sure how to compare efficiency of having to store very large string keys in the map vs having to hash those strings on every call. I bet @birick1 knows.