-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added removal of "v" on handler #21
Conversation
WalkthroughThe change introduces a conditional check in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Manifests
Client->>Manifests: Call Handle(target)
Manifests-->>Client: Process target
alt target starts with "v"
Manifests->>Manifests: Remove leading "v"
end
Manifests-->>Client: Return processed target
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@EStork09, can you please describe the behavior in the README! |
To align with the format of the manifests map (removes the v) and to address #17.
The prepareChart removes the "v" if it is on the chart version resulting in the manifest target keys to be without the "v".
Removing the v from the target variable seems to be fine, you seem to be able to use with the helm client either interchangeable after this change/with the repo itself by default. i.e.:
I am not entirely sure if this will have any other impact, but so far this appears to address the issue mentioned previously.
Summary by CodeRabbit
target
variable.