Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebuild for libnetcdf480 #34

Conversation

regro-cf-autotick-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update libnetcdf480.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

  1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
  2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.

This package has the following downstream children:

And potentially more.

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot.
The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. If you would like a local version of this bot, you might consider using rever. Rever is a tool for automating software releases and forms the backbone of the bot's conda-forge PRing capability. Rever is both conda (conda install -c conda-forge rever) and pip (pip install re-ver) installable.
Finally, feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues!
This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/autotick-bot/actions/runs/765235616, please use this URL for debugging

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

  • License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Apr 20, 2021

Getting some sort of CMake error that's well beyond my exprtise:

-- Found HDF5: $PREFIX/lib/libhdf5.so (found version "1.10.6") found components: C HL 
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:405 (CHECK_LIBRARY_EXISTS):
  CHECK_LIBRARY_EXISTS Macro invoked with incorrect arguments for macro
  named: CHECK_LIBRARY_EXISTS

Anyone else?

@kmuehlbauer
Copy link
Contributor

@xylar This looks like fix: Unidata/netcdf-cxx4#92. Unfortunately, I'll not have time until the weekend to try this.

@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Apr 20, 2021

@kmuehlbauer, thanks for tracking that one down. I added the patch. Let's see what happens.

@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Apr 20, 2021

Nope, patching looks way more complicated than I was hoping. Both of the affected CMakeList.txt files have been edited many times since the last release so I'll have to leave it to you, @kmuehlbauer. I'm going to remove my attempt at patching.

@xylar xylar force-pushed the rebuild-libnetcdf480-0-1_hb0fecb branch from 3a65503 to df7ccb7 Compare April 20, 2021 08:02
@kmuehlbauer
Copy link
Contributor

@xylar Thanks anyway for trying. The last release is from September 2019. Seems like a major adventure to patch things up.

@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Apr 20, 2021

I agree, this will be hard. Maybe the developers know they're due for a release?

@kmuehlbauer
Copy link
Contributor

@xylar There is a milestone for 4.3.2 but there is no due date. I've raised an issue with the build error over there: Unidata/netcdf-cxx4#106

@xylar xylar mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2021
@xylar xylar marked this pull request as draft September 1, 2021 15:13
@xylar xylar mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2021
5 tasks
@xylar
Copy link
Contributor

xylar commented Dec 6, 2021

closed via #36

@xylar xylar closed this Dec 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants