-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Co-authored-by: Lucas Fayoux <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
13 changed files
with
1,379 additions
and
98 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
model: "command-r" | ||
messages: | ||
- role: "user" | ||
content: "Tell me about LLMs" | ||
stream: false |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ | ||
model: "command-r" | ||
messages: | ||
- role: "user" | ||
content: "Who is more popular: Nsync or Backstreet Boys?" | ||
documents: | ||
- title: "CSPC: Backstreet Boys Popularity Analysis - ChartMasters" | ||
snippet: >- | ||
↓ Skip to Main Content | ||
Music industry – One step closer to being accurate | ||
CSPC: Backstreet Boys Popularity Analysis | ||
Hernán Lopez Posted on February 9, 2017 Posted in CSPC 72 Comments Tagged with Backstreet Boys, Boy band | ||
At one point, Backstreet Boys defined success: massive albums sales across the globe, great singles sales, plenty of chart topping releases, hugely hyped tours and tremendous media coverage. | ||
It is true that they benefited from extraordinarily good market conditions in all markets. After all, the all-time record year for the music business, as far as revenues in billion dollars are concerned, was actually 1999. That is, back when this five men group was at its peak. | ||
- title: "CSPC: NSYNC Popularity Analysis - ChartMasters" | ||
snippet: >- | ||
↓ Skip to Main Content | ||
Music industry – One step closer to being accurate | ||
CSPC: NSYNC Popularity Analysis | ||
MJD Posted on February 9, 2018 Posted in CSPC 27 Comments Tagged with Boy band, N'Sync | ||
At the turn of the millennium three teen acts were huge in the US, the Backstreet Boys, Britney Spears and NSYNC. The latter is the only one we haven’t study so far. It took 15 years and Adele to break their record of 2,4 million units sold of No Strings Attached in its first week alone. | ||
It wasn’t a fluke, as the second fastest selling album of the Soundscan era prior 2015, was also theirs since Celebrity debuted with 1,88 million units sold. | ||
- title: "CSPC: Backstreet Boys Popularity Analysis - ChartMasters" | ||
snippet: >-2 | ||
1997, 1998, 2000 and 2001 also rank amongst some of the very best years. | ||
Yet the way many music consumers – especially teenagers and young women’s – embraced their output deserves its own chapter. If Jonas Brothers and more recently One Direction reached a great level of popularity during the past decade, the type of success achieved by Backstreet Boys is in a completely different level as they really dominated the business for a few years all over the world, including in some countries that were traditionally hard to penetrate for Western artists. | ||
We will try to analyze the extent of that hegemony with this new article with final results which will more than surprise many readers. | ||
- title: "CSPC: NSYNC Popularity Analysis - ChartMasters" | ||
snippet: >-2 | ||
Was the teen group led by Justin Timberlake really that big? Was it only in the US where they found success? Or were they a global phenomenon? | ||
As usual, I’ll be using the Commensurate Sales to Popularity Concept in order to relevantly gauge their results. This concept will not only bring you sales information for all NSYNC‘s albums, physical and download singles, as well as audio and video streaming, but it will also determine their true popularity. If you are not yet familiar with the CSPC method, the next page explains it with a short video. I fully recommend watching the video before getting into the sales figures. | ||
stream: false |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
model: "command-r" | ||
messages: | ||
- role: "user" | ||
content: "Hello!" | ||
stream: true |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | ||
model: "command-r" | ||
messages: | ||
- role: "user" | ||
content: "Tell me about LLMs" | ||
tools: | ||
- type: function | ||
function: | ||
name: query_daily_sales_report | ||
description: Connects to a database to retrieve overall sales volumes and sales | ||
information for a given day. | ||
parameters: | ||
type: object | ||
properties: | ||
day: | ||
description: Retrieves sales data for this day, formatted as YYYY-MM-DD. | ||
type: str | ||
required: | ||
- day | ||
- type: function | ||
function: | ||
name: query_product_catalog | ||
description: Connects to a a product catalog with information about all the | ||
products being sold, including categories, prices, and stock levels. | ||
parameters: | ||
type: object | ||
properties: | ||
category: | ||
description: Retrieves product information data for all products in this category. | ||
type: str | ||
required: | ||
- category | ||
stream: false |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
body: | ||
id: c14c80c3-18eb-4519-9460-6c92edd8cfb4 | ||
message: | ||
role: "assistant" | ||
content: | ||
- type: "text" | ||
text: "LLMs stand for Large Language Models, which are a type of neural network model specialized in processing and generating human language. They are designed to understand and respond to natural language input and have become increasingly popular and valuable in recent years.\n\nLLMs are trained on vast amounts of text data, enabling them to learn patterns, grammar, and semantic meanings present in the language. These models can then be used for various natural language processing tasks, such as text generation, summarization, question answering, machine translation, sentiment analysis, and even some aspects of natural language understanding.\n\nSome well-known examples of LLMs include:\n\n1. GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3) — An open-source LLM developed by OpenAI, capable of generating human-like text and performing various language tasks.\n\n2. BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) — A Google-developed LLM that is particularly good at understanding contextual relationships in text, and is widely used for natural language understanding tasks like sentiment analysis and named entity recognition.\n\n3. T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) — Also from Google, T5 is a flexible LLM that frames all language tasks as text-to-text problems, where the model learns to generate output text based on input text prompts.\n\n4. RoBERTa (Robustly Optimized BERT Approach) — A variant of BERT that uses additional training techniques to improve performance.\n\n5. DeBERTa (Decoding-enhanced BERT with disentangled attention) — Another variant of BERT that introduces a new attention mechanism.\n\nLLMs have become increasingly powerful and larger in scale, improving the accuracy and sophistication of language tasks. They are also being used as a foundation for developing various applications, including chatbots, content recommendation systems, language translation services, and more. \n\nThe future of LLMs holds the potential for even more sophisticated language technologies, with ongoing research and development focused on enhancing their capabilities, improving efficiency, and exploring their applications in various domains." | ||
finish_reason: complete | ||
usage: | ||
billed_units: | ||
input_tokens: 5 | ||
output_tokens: 418 | ||
tokens: | ||
input_tokens: 71 | ||
output_tokens: 418 |
Oops, something went wrong.