Same sign WW dim6 cards

[GiacomoBoldrini]

The extra-model additional restriction card can be found here
http://gboldrin.web.cern.ch/gboldrin/generators/restrict_cW_cHWB_cHDD_cHbox_cHW_cHl1_cHl3_cHq1_cHq3_cqq1_cqq11_cqq31_cqq3_cll_cll1_massless.dat

[GiacomoBoldrini]

Following the PRs
#2969
#3079

a SMEFTsim model with multiple restriction cards might be needed in https://cms-project-generators.web.cern.ch/cms-project-generators

I tried to add some general restriction cards for the PRs above and also single and pairs of operators from a set of 15. I do not know if adding a restriction card every-time is sustainable but if you need you can find the tarred SMEFTsim model with the restrictions here:

http://gboldrin.web.cern.ch/gboldrin/generators/SMEFTsim_U35_MwScheme_UFO.tar.gz

Thank you! I'm at disposal for anything

[agrohsje]

Dear @GiacomoBoldrini , I prefer including the restriction cards in the central file so it is easier to keep track. Let's first finish :
#3084 (comment)
and then finish the review of this PR as well as
#2969
#3079 ?
Does this make sense?

[sihyunjeon]

@GiacomoBoldrini ping

[Saptaparna]

Hi @GiacomoBoldrini : I see this PR: #3084 is connected too. Any news on either front?

[GiacomoBoldrini]

Hi sorry for the later reply.

In the last commit i included the restriction card. I also moved back to mb = 0 in the restriction and switched back to 5fs in the run card.

@agrohsje but the issue raised from #3084 are not related to all the PRs you mentioned (as in the PRs we do not change model or anything like that, contrary to the issue). I do not see the connection between the issue and the PRs, maybe i did not understand.

@Saptaparna I have no news regarding #3084 and probably won't work on that in the future as i have no new test to be made and we are converging to the semileptonic-gridpacks through other paths.

[anpicci]

Hello everybody,
I'm writing this as contact person of the ssWW VBS analysis with hadronic tau. We are also interested to produce samples with this set of cards, but we would like to update a new reweight_card that is compatible with the needs of aforementioned analysis

VBSssWW_dim6_reweight_card.dat.txt

If for you it is ok to implement it in the gridpack, we would like to add this reweight_card to this PR.

@mpresill also supervisioned the writing of this card.

[Saptaparna]

@anpicci: Since you are adding taus, please commit your process card.

[anpicci]

Hi @Saptaparna , the taus (also the hadronic ones) are already included in the current proc_card, for what both @GiacomoBoldrini and I know about the implementation of taus in madgraph.

This type of implementation of taus was used also for other VBS processes, and in those cases at the end there were also events with hadronic taus. The latter should depend only on the Pythia side, shoudn't it?

[Saptaparna]

Cards look fine to me.
j = g u c d s u~ c~ d~ s~ b b~, 5 = maxjetflavor and the b's are massless. All good, I think!
@menglu21 and @mlizzo please cross check, so we can merge this PR. Thanks!

[mlizzo]

Hi @GiacomoBoldrini , cards look fine to me as well, I have just two minor comments (one is actually for @Saptaparna @GurpreetSinghChahal @menglu21 ) :

1. I see that your restriction card is not in the central model. It's not a problem for me, but I wonder if it would be better to include it. @agrohsje already raised this comment some time ago, can anyone - who has rights to do it - upload it? I don't think I can honestly.

2. Since cut_decays is set true, wouldn't it better to generate leptons within |eta| < 3? This should optimize your phase space, although I see that the very same run_card has been used for dim8 operators (https://github.com/cms-sw/genproductions/blob/master/bin/MadGraph5_aMCatNLO/cards/WW_leptonic/WWjj_SS_dim8_ewk_run_card.dat), maybe we want some consistency.

The PR could be merged already for me, but I'll let other people comment on this before proceeding.

[Saptaparna]

Thanks, @mlizzo! I can take care of uploading the model.

[GiacomoBoldrini]

Thanks @mlizzo and @Saptaparna to having a look.
I agree with the eta cut that would for sure help the efficiency but as you noticed the run card is identical to the dim-8 one for consistency. We will take that into consideration for future iterations.
If you'd like a 3 > |etal| cut i can add it anyway, let me know.

Best,
Giacomo

[Saptaparna]

@GiacomoBoldrini can you please send me this model: SMEFTsim_U35_MwScheme_UFO-cW_cHWB_cHDD_cHbox_cHW_cHl1_cHl3_cHq1_cHq3_cqq1_cqq11_cqq31_cqq3_cll_cll1_massless or is it regular SMEFT with the restrict card? We need to make that there are no name issues when the gridpack is extracted during central production of samples.

[GiacomoBoldrini]

Hello @Saptaparna,

Yes your second answer is correct.
The model is SMEFTsim_U35_MwScheme_UFO and the restriction card I added to this PR (restrict_cW_cHWB_cHDD_cHbox_cHW_cHl1_cHl3_cHq1_cHq3_cqq1_cqq11_cqq31_cqq3_cll_cll1_massless.dat) was copied inside.

[mlizzo]

@GiacomoBoldrini ok, then if no one else has further comments to raise I would ask either @Saptaparna @GurpreetSinghChahal or @menglu21 to merge this PR when they have uploaded your restriction card in the model

[Saptaparna]

Done!