Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2022. It is now read-only.

Deploy without a CF #77

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Deploy without a CF #77

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gerhard
Copy link

@gerhard gerhard commented Aug 14, 2015

This is a great bosh MySQL release that might not always be deployed alongside a CloudFoundry. All CF components are still in the release, but we want to create a manifest that disables them without breaking the deployment.

The mysql-stub-spiff-3-node.yml can be used on a clean bosh-lite, without any CF. We'll try this on AWS next and come back with manifest additions if required.

Also relates to cloudfoundry-attic/cf-mysql-acceptance-tests#2

This is a great bosh MySQL release that might not always be deployed
alongisde a CloudFoundry. All CF components are still in the release,
but we want to create a manifest that disables them without breaking the
deployment.

The mysql-stub-spiff-3-node.yml can be used on a clean bosh-lite,
without any CF and it will just work. We'll try this on AWS next and
come back with manifest additions if required.

Also relates to cloudfoundry-attic/cf-mysql-acceptance-tests#2
@cfdreddbot
Copy link

Hey gerhard!

Thanks for submitting this pull request! I'm here to inform the recipients of the pull request that you've already signed the CLA.

@cf-gitbot
Copy link
Collaborator

We have created an issue in Pivotal Tracker to manage this. You can view the current status of your issue at: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/101289488.

@evashort
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gerhard, by coincidence we had just started working on this feature before we saw your PR. You can see these stories here and here. However, in our stories we assumed that the number of broker instances would be set to 0 rather than making the broker standalone. Would that be a problem for your use case, or do you need the brokers to be available? We would hate for you to think that the effort you put into this was wasted, and we want to emphasize how much we appreciate contributions to our open-source projects. We apologize for not keeping you in the loop when we started working on this feature.

@menicosia
Copy link
Contributor

Closing; please let us know if there's something that we've missed that you feel is important. Otherwise, we'll be making progress on this, so stay tuned!

Marco Nicosia

@menicosia menicosia closed this Aug 21, 2015
@gerhard
Copy link
Author

gerhard commented Sep 11, 2015

As long as this bosh release can be deployed without CF, I honestly don't mind how that's achieved. Looking forward to having this feature land in a future stable release.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants