-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Rel8 to work with Opaleye's #586 #305
Conversation
countRows = aggregate countStar | ||
countRows = aggregate countStar . (true <$) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious about why this change is needed. What's going on here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It makes me concerned that there's some implication of the corresponding Opaleye change that I'm not aware of.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, maybe it's just to get a Table Expr i
instance? If so then that's fine. (I was worried that there was some subtlety about the SQL that we generate, and this change was to avoid a crashing query.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I imagine it's to avoid propagating that constraint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, that's reassuring. If so then there's nothing I don't understand and my PR is ready to go Opaleye-side. @duairc, could you please confirm?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies for the delay, but yes I can confirm that this is just to get a Table Expr
instance.
3b099ff
to
b6e8126
Compare
b6e8126
to
ecc1ce1
Compare
No description provided.