Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix for SCA proxy bugs #80

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix for SCA proxy bugs #80

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ilandn
Copy link

@ilandn ilandn commented Jun 7, 2022

By submitting a PR to this repository, you agree to the terms within the [Checkmarx Code of Conduct]https://github.com/checkmarx-ltd/open-source-template/blob/master/CODE-OF-CONDUCT.md). Please see the contributing guidelines for how to create and submit a high-quality PR for this repo.

Description

Describe the purpose of this PR along with any background information and the impacts of the proposed change.

References

Include supporting link to GitHub Issue/PR number

Testing

Describe how this change was tested. Be specific about anything not tested and reasons why. If this solution has unit and/or integration testing, tests should be added for new functionality and existing tests should complete without errors.

Please include any manual steps for testing end-to-end or functionality not covered by unit/integration tests.

Checklist

  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR (if applicable). If documentaiton is a Wiki Update, please indicate desired changes within PR MD Comment
  • All active GitHub checks for tests, formatting, and security are passing
  • The correct base branch is being used

CR_by: N/A
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 7, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 3 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Contributor

@umeshwaghode umeshwaghode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes done for 573 will break the PAC proxy use case and also the case when proxy parameters are configured directly on the agent, not in the pipeline.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants