Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync docs from Discourse #700

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Sync docs from Discourse #700

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Dec 14, 2024

  • Sync charm docs from https://discourse.charmhub.io
  • Edit workflow file to prevent automatically tagging Vladimir as reviewer (this is expected to cause the CLA check to fail)

@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from a-velasco and izmalk December 14, 2024 01:22
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the sync-docs branch 8 times, most recently from db75065 to 6c2304f Compare December 22, 2024 01:22
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the sync-docs branch 7 times, most recently from f06200e to a5c0c96 Compare December 29, 2024 01:22
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the sync-docs branch 7 times, most recently from 68d69f5 to fb7f127 Compare January 5, 2025 01:22
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the sync-docs branch 2 times, most recently from a58275d to c4381c2 Compare January 7, 2025 01:22
@a-velasco a-velasco removed the request for review from izmalk January 7, 2025 10:49
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ jobs:
name: Sync docs from Discourse
uses: canonical/data-platform-workflows/.github/workflows/[email protected]
with:
reviewers: a-velasco,izmalk
reviewers: a-velasco
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants