Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(22.04): add 'data' slice to openssl SDF #263

Conversation

zhijie-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhijie-yang zhijie-yang commented Jun 21, 2024

Proposed changes

Refer to #262

Related issues/PRs

Forward porting

Not applicable. Releases starting from noble already have this.

Checklist

feat: add basic slice definitions files for Focal
rebornplusplus and others added 14 commits March 5, 2024 13:15
This commit sorts the <slice>.essential list and <slice>.content map
entries in an ASCENDING order.
* chore(20.04): add pkg-deps job

This commit adds a new pkg-deps job on Pull Request. It checks in
changed files if slices of any package A has been listed in "essential"
of a slice in package B, but B does not depend on A. If found, the CI
will add a comment in the Pull Request with the findings.

* chore: rename new workflow
---------

Co-authored-by: Cristovao Cordeiro <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Diff of dependencies:

slices/openssl.yaml
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 libc6
-libssl3
+libssl1.1

@zhijie-yang zhijie-yang force-pushed the ROCKS-994-openssl_data-slice-22.04 branch from dddf116 to c3ff99b Compare June 21, 2024 17:48
Copy link

@linostar linostar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@zhijie-yang zhijie-yang force-pushed the ROCKS-994-openssl_data-slice-22.04 branch from 550e6f0 to 0c9e0fd Compare July 4, 2024 09:28
@zhijie-yang zhijie-yang closed this Jul 4, 2024
@zhijie-yang zhijie-yang force-pushed the ROCKS-994-openssl_data-slice-22.04 branch from 0c9e0fd to 53faf02 Compare July 4, 2024 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants