Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

potter_defconfig: enable MODS_USB_EXT_BRIDGE and MODS_CODEC_BUS #27

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: lineage-15.1-64
Choose a base branch
from
Open

potter_defconfig: enable MODS_USB_EXT_BRIDGE and MODS_CODEC_BUS #27

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kentdobias
Copy link

These options are required to successfully link the greybus code added in I47fb884978285ee745ec57c08ee32f8779023b1b.

@kentdobias
potter_defconfig: enable MODS_USB_EXT_BRIDGE and MODS_USB_EXT_BRIDGE …
28ce9e9 
…required by greybus

Change-Id: I3df63a631cbb9a4e3ce7f78ba13687f982d9b0cb
@kentdobias kentdobias changed the title potter_defconfig: enable MODS_USB_EXT_BRIDGE and MODS_USB_EXT_BRIDGE potter_defconfig: enable MODS_USB_EXT_BRIDGE and MODS_CODEC_BUS Aug 7, 2018
@Martichou
Copy link

As far as I know potter doesn't support mods.
Maybe I'm wrong, and if I am can you kindly explain me why and how mods are used on potter?

Thanks.

@kentdobias
Copy link
Author

I honestly don't know, but this fixes a compile error introduced recently. Either compilation of mods_codec_bus.c and usb_ext_bridge.c need to be enabled, or compilation of greybus/mods_codec.c and greybus/usb-ext.c need to be disabled, since the latter rely on functions supplied by the former.

@Martichou
Copy link

Thanks, that's strange by the way.
Will see what Vache and other will say about this.

fernandobouchet pushed a commit to fernandobouchet/android_kernel_motorola_msm8953 that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2018
@gregkh
enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic_probe
2416eb0 
[ Upstream commit 3256d29fc7aecdf99feb1cb9475ed2252769a8a7 ]

lockdep spotted that we are using rfs_h.lock in enic_get_rxnfc() without
initializing. rfs_h.lock is initialized in enic_open(). But ethtool_ops
can be called when interface is down.

Move enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init to enic_probe.

INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 18 PID: 1189 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7-devel+ boulzordev#27
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc0
register_lock_class+0x550/0x560
? __handle_mm_fault+0xa8b/0x1100
__lock_acquire+0x81/0x670
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x1e0
?  enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x80
? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
ethtool_get_rxnfc+0x8d/0x1c0
dev_ethtool+0x16c8/0x2400
? __mutex_lock+0x64d/0xa00
? dev_load+0x6a/0x150
dev_ioctl+0x253/0x4b0
sock_do_ioctl+0x9a/0x130
sock_ioctl+0x1af/0x350
do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x670
? syscall_trace_enter+0x1e2/0x380
ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x170
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
MasterAwesome pushed a commit to MasterAwesome/android_kernel_motorola_msm8953 that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2018
@premaca
enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic_probe
11742b7 
[ Upstream commit 3256d29fc7aecdf99feb1cb9475ed2252769a8a7 ]

lockdep spotted that we are using rfs_h.lock in enic_get_rxnfc() without
initializing. rfs_h.lock is initialized in enic_open(). But ethtool_ops
can be called when interface is down.

Move enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init to enic_probe.

INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 18 PID: 1189 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7-devel+ boulzordev#27
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc0
register_lock_class+0x550/0x560
? __handle_mm_fault+0xa8b/0x1100
__lock_acquire+0x81/0x670
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x1e0
?  enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x80
? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
ethtool_get_rxnfc+0x8d/0x1c0
dev_ethtool+0x16c8/0x2400
? __mutex_lock+0x64d/0xa00
? dev_load+0x6a/0x150
dev_ioctl+0x253/0x4b0
sock_do_ioctl+0x9a/0x130
sock_ioctl+0x1af/0x350
do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x670
? syscall_trace_enter+0x1e2/0x380
ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x170
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
kerlerm pushed a commit to kerlerm/android_kernel_motorola_msm8953 that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2018
@kerlerm
enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic_probe
95fdc44 
[ Upstream commit 3256d29fc7aecdf99feb1cb9475ed2252769a8a7 ]

lockdep spotted that we are using rfs_h.lock in enic_get_rxnfc() without
initializing. rfs_h.lock is initialized in enic_open(). But ethtool_ops
can be called when interface is down.

Move enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init to enic_probe.

INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 18 PID: 1189 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7-devel+ boulzordev#27
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc0
register_lock_class+0x550/0x560
? __handle_mm_fault+0xa8b/0x1100
__lock_acquire+0x81/0x670
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x1e0
?  enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x80
? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
ethtool_get_rxnfc+0x8d/0x1c0
dev_ethtool+0x16c8/0x2400
? __mutex_lock+0x64d/0xa00
? dev_load+0x6a/0x150
dev_ioctl+0x253/0x4b0
sock_do_ioctl+0x9a/0x130
sock_ioctl+0x1af/0x350
do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x670
? syscall_trace_enter+0x1e2/0x380
ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x170
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kentdobias @Martichou