Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: move images of the "process" module #2920

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

benjaminParisel
Copy link
Contributor

The images were stored in the Antora legacy folder (assets/images) and included an extra "images" sub-folder. All images are now in the "images" folder of the module, which is the standard Antora folder.

Covers bonitasoft/bonita-documentation-site#620

The images were stored in the Antora legacy folder (assets/images) and included an extra "images" sub-folder.
All images are now in the "images" folder of the module, which is the standard Antora folder.

Covers bonitasoft/bonita-documentation-site#620
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

📝 Contribution Summary

To merge this Pull Request, you need to check your updates with the following URL.

🔗 Updated pages

@bonita-ci
Copy link
Contributor

bonita-ci commented Dec 2, 2024

🎊 PR Preview 5ed18aa has been successfully built and deployed to https://bonitasoft-bonita-doc-deploy-pr-2920.surge.sh

🕐 Build time: 0.011s

🤖 By surge-preview

@benjaminParisel benjaminParisel marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 09:34
Copy link
Member

@tbouffard tbouffard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@benjaminParisel benjaminParisel merged commit 46ab71d into 2022.2 Dec 2, 2024
6 checks passed
@benjaminParisel benjaminParisel deleted the refactor/move_images_for_process_module branch December 2, 2024 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants