Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add initial Haskell support #130

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

charrsky
Copy link

@charrsky charrsky commented Aug 5, 2022

I would like to add Haskell support (only .csv output of criterion package for now). I had some issues with passing the checks in my fork, so I would be happy to respond to some review (this is my first time dealing with Typescript or Javascript so I might have overlooked some important things)!

@michaelpj
Copy link

Hi, we would love to use this, was there something blocking this from getting in?

@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ This action currently supports the following tools:
- [BenchmarkTools.jl][] for Julia packages
- [Benchmark.Net][benchmarkdotnet] for .Net projects
- [benchmarkluau](https://github.com/Roblox/luau/tree/master/bench) for Luau projects
- [criterion](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/criterion) for Haskell projects
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am slightly confused by the naming. You're using criterion/cabal interchangeably. Which one is the correct one? Additionally, I would suggest adding haskel- prefix anyway just to make sure it's more obvious. So either haskell-cabal or haskel-criterion

| .Net | [![C# Benchmark.Net Example Workflow][benchmarkdotnet-badge]][benchmarkdotnet-workflow-example] | [examples/benchmarkdotnet](./examples/benchmarkdotnet) |
| Luau | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Haskell | | |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add appropriate links here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants