-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add go-tree-sitter 20240827094217-dd81d9e9be82 #3366
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hello @bazelbuild/bcr-maintainers, modules without existing maintainers (go-tree-sitter) have been updated in this PR. Please review the changes. |
Author: Douglas Thor <[email protected]> | ||
Date: Thu Nov 21 04:19:47 2024 +0000 | ||
|
||
Run gazelle |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add the exact go install
/ run commands, including Gazelle versions?
+1 for keeping it in BCR instead of Doug's own fork. That reduces the bus factor by a lot. |
There is one issue with the BCR option: It doesn't support the old WORKSPACE stuff. (Right?) |
… Parameter Syntax) by using dougthor42's fork of go-tree-sitter (#2496) Replaces #2413. Fixes #2396. This updates the `go-tree-sitter` dependency to use my fork that includes `BUILD.bazel` files. Specifically, the `BUILD.bazel` files in the fork include references to top-level code like `array.h` which the original Gazelle-generated files for `go-tree-sitter` were not able to handle. I also include the test cases that @maffoo created in #2413 and verified that they (a) fail before the fix and (b) pass after the fix. The fork is: https://github.com/dougthor42/go-tree-sitter The branch that includes all changes is: https://github.com/dougthor42/go-tree-sitter/tree/for-rules-python-gazelle-plugin A couple notes: + I have a PR open to get `go-tree-sitter` into BCR [here](bazelbuild/bazel-central-registry#3366). However: 1. I'm having trouble getting tests to pass and to get things running locally to validate it 2. Using BCR would not fix things for people who still use WORKSPACE (right?) + The fork is _mostly_ [autogenerated BUILD.bazel files from gazelle](smacker/go-tree-sitter@cfa9bdf) but also contains: + [manual updates so that build files reference the toplevel `array.h` and other files](smacker/go-tree-sitter@63f89cd) + [replace all `smacker` with `dougthor42` so that `go build` works](smacker/go-tree-sitter@8a73cbd) + various other more minor things. + I was unable to get `go mod edit -replace` to work, so I've just manually updated `go.mod` and whatnot everywhere. If someone with more go knowledge has a suggestion I'm happy to hear it. --------- Co-authored-by: Matthew Neeley <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ignas Anikevicius <[email protected]>
Add
go-tree-sitter
@ 20240827094217-dd81d9e9be82.go-tree-sitter
is a dep ofrules_python_gazelle_plugin
. The goal of gettinggo-tree-sitter
into BCR is to allow us to bump the grammar parser so that PEP 695 (Type Parameter Syntax) is correctly parsed by Gazelle (see bazelbuild/rules_python#2396 and bazelbuild/rules_python#2413).Similar to
circl
(#674), the core patch03_add_autogenerated_build_files.patch
was autogenerated by Gazelle. The others were manually tweaked to get builds to work.Addressing some potential questions:
go-tree-sitter
does not appear to be open to the ideadougthor42
namespace) and I'm hesitant to have a Bus Factor of 1. I'm willing to maintain it, though. In fact, the patches in PR were based off my branch here: https://github.com/dougthor42/go-tree-sitter/tree/bcrrules_python_gazelle_plugin
to depend on the fork instead.Related Links:
gazelle
to support patching (rejected)gazelle
(rejected)