Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CONSTITUTION.md #107

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

WaqarMMirza
Copy link
Contributor

Minor corrections and formatting. In many places, the token of AtomOne is referred to as ATOM/ATOMs, If not intended, it should be changed to ATONE/ATONEs.

Minor corrections and formating.
Copy link
Collaborator

@giunatale giunatale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor comments.
In any case thanks for the proof-reading, much appreciated.

CONSTITUTION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONSTITUTION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ on the AtomOne Hub.

Any Cosmonaut can also become a Citizen of the AtomOne Hub by using their
address to stake ATOMs toward the AtomOne Hub and participate actively in
governance. The status of citizenship is granted in an autonomous manner.
governance. The status of citizenship is granted autonomously.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you really believe autonomously is better here? the difference is subtle, but to me in an autonomous manner seems more explicit

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe "autonomously" makes more sense here.

@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ complexity demands more intracellular security.)
Imagine how easy it would be to create a fund and simply buy VISA… well not
even buy, but simply bond the capital of the market cap of VISA, of $391B.
That’s a lot of money, but if bonding that capital means one can take control
over the financial system, people would lend their money in a heartbeat. But
of the financial system, people would lend their money in a heartbeat. But
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe, but over is a bit more impactful here, simbolizing a top-down strings-pulling.
Maybe I would leave it as is

@giunatale
Copy link
Collaborator

Minor corrections and formatting. In many places, the token of AtomOne is referred to as ATOM/ATOMs, If not intended, it should be changed to ATONE/ATONEs.

Can you reply with some example? AFAIK, everywhere ATOM is mentioned, it's because it's supposed to be ATOM and not the ATONE token.

Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Natale <[email protected]>
@WaqarMMirza
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have checked again thoroughly, the readme file does not have any Atom/Atone anomaly in the current version.

Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Natale <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants