Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update private block api usage #64

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

braingram
Copy link
Contributor

@braingram braingram commented May 16, 2023

ASDF PR: asdf-format/asdf#1537
changes some of the internal API for block management and access that sphinx-asdf currently relies on for displaying ASDF blocks.

This PR updates sphinx-asdf to be compatible with both the old and new internal APIs.

I currently have the asdf source branch for asdf-format/asdf#1537 configured to build documentation from the sphinx-asdf source branch for this PR.

I will leave this as draft for now. Once we decide on the internal API changes in asdf-format/asdf#1537 we can bring this out of draft (after updating it with any necessary changes), merge and release sphinx-asdf then bump the required minimum version so it should be ready for an eventual release of ASDF 3.0.

@braingram braingram force-pushed the immutable_block_manager branch from dae8695 to f026439 Compare August 9, 2023 17:28
@braingram braingram marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2023 17:26
Copy link
Contributor

@eslavich eslavich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if this needs any changes to catch up with the current state of the asdf branch, but if not looks good to me.

@braingram braingram merged commit fa6e004 into asdf-format:main Sep 5, 2023
@braingram braingram deleted the immutable_block_manager branch September 5, 2023 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants