Library update/install with --no-overwrite will perform the update if it's possible to keep already installed dependencies at their current version

[cmaglie]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

See how to contribute

• The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests
  before creating one)
• The PR follows
  our contributing guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
• UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)
• configuration.schema.json updated if new parameters are added.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Updated the semver library to the latest version with many improvements.
• Allows to install libraries with lib install --no-overwrite flags when there are already installed dependencies
• Adds a --no-overwrite flag to lib deps to check the solution found by the install planner.

See #1799 for more details.

What is the current behavior?

$ arduino-cli lib deps [email protected]  
✕ Bounce2 2.71.0 is required but 2.53 is currently installed.
✕ EncoderTool 2.2.0 must be installed.

$ arduino-cli lib deps [email protected] --no-overwrite
Error: unknown flag: --no-overwrite
[....]

$ arduino-cli lib install [email protected] --no-overwrite
Error installing EncoderTool: Library [email protected] is already installed, but with a different version: [email protected]

What is the new behavior?

$ arduino-cli lib deps [email protected]  
✕ Bounce2 2.71.0 is required but 2.53 is currently installed.
✕ EncoderTool 2.2.0 must be installed.

$ arduino-cli lib deps [email protected] --no-overwrite
✓ Bounce2 2.53 is already installed.
✕ EncoderTool 2.2.0 must be installed.

$ arduino-cli lib install [email protected] --no-overwrite
Already installed [email protected]
Downloading [email protected]...
[email protected] [email protected] already downloaded
Installing [email protected]...
Installed [email protected]

Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?

Other information

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (89f8f04) 67.33% compared to head (f76d12a) 67.43%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ino/libraries/librariesmanager/librariesmanager.go	75.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2431      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.33%   67.43%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         210      210              
  Lines       20567    20591      +24     
==========================================
+ Hits        13849    13886      +37     
+ Misses       5581     5572       -9     
+ Partials     1137     1133       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	67.43% <96.72%> (+0.10%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.