Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade yargs from 17.6.2 to 17.7.1 #108

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

samuelmanzanera
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade yargs from 17.6.2 to 17.7.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 3 months ago, on 2023-02-21.
Release notes
Package name: yargs from yargs GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: yargs
  • 1c938ae chore: v17.7.1 release
  • 2b6ba31 chore(main): release 17.7.1 (#2304)
  • 9aa2490 fix: address display bug with default sub-commands (#2303)
  • 663c1b6 chore(main): release 17.7.0 (#2285)
  • 4cb41dc feat: convert line break to whitespace for the description of the option (#2271)
  • 7dc1086 test: mock additional hasColors method introduced in Node 16 (#2297)
  • f37ee6f fix: copy the description of the option to its alias in completion (#2269)
  • 1fd530a chore: add en strings for unknown command (#2262)
  • 2c144c4 feat: add method to hide option extras (#2156)
  • 6cb69fb build: pin npm version (#2284)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants