Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add explicit values for 'eDataType' #1828

Merged

Conversation

grospelliergilles
Copy link
Member

Also check that values of Arccore::ISerializer::eDataType and Arcane::eDataType are the same.

@grospelliergilles grospelliergilles added arcane Arcane Component refactoring Code refactoring and cleanup labels Dec 8, 2024
@grospelliergilles grospelliergilles self-assigned this Dec 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.24%. Comparing base (25f4dfe) to head (e9f081c).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1828   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.24%   70.24%           
=======================================
  Files        2263     2263           
  Lines      162812   162812           
  Branches    18766    18766           
=======================================
+ Hits       114363   114367    +4     
+ Misses      41672    41668    -4     
  Partials     6777     6777           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@grospelliergilles grospelliergilles merged commit 9f53935 into main Dec 8, 2024
32 checks passed
@grospelliergilles grospelliergilles deleted the dev/gg-add-explicit-values-for-arcane-edatatype branch December 12, 2024 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arcane Arcane Component refactoring Code refactoring and cleanup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant