Update to Kustomize v5 #646
Conversation
|
@halim-lee Is this something ready to be included in 1.4.0? If so, please resolve the merge conflict (from recent PR merges I guess) |
|
@leochr This can go into the next release! It would need more testing on OLO and WLO side |
| @@ -214,14 +214,6 @@ rules: | |||
| - list | |||
| - update | |||
| - watch | |||
| - apiGroups: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this intentionally being removed? If so, wondering the reason for it.
|
@halim-lee Okay. That'll be fine. I was just wondering whether this would be good to roll out in a minor release (with channel change). But I guess this would be an internal change and wouldn't impact the produced kustomize/kubectl artifacts that users consume, right? Just added one inquiry about the removal of namespaces from RBAC. I know you are occupied with other things including 1.4.0 items, so I don't expect an answer for it this week. It's not urgent and can wait. Thanks |
What this PR does / why we need it?:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
CHANGELOG.mdWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #