-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support type: 'null'
as OpenAPIValueContainer
#557
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
type: 'null'
as OpenAPIValueContainertype: 'null'
as OpenAPIValueContainer
@@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ struct TypeMatcher { | |||
private static func _tryMatchBuiltinNonRecursive(for schema: JSONSchema.Schema) -> TypeUsage? { | |||
let typeName: TypeName | |||
switch schema { | |||
case .null(_): typeName = TypeName.valueContainer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm I'm still unsure whether we want to promote null to a JSON value here. Let's discuss in the other PR first, then we can come back to this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also considered the singleton instance of NSNull, or some new enum type with one case, or ()
or something. It wasn't obvious if there was a more appropriate type for this in Swift.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm maybe we should introduce an typealias OpenAPINull = Void
in the runtime library, and use that? What do you think? cc @simonjbeaumont
OpenAPIValueContainer
isn't appropriate, I think, as it erases our knowledge of it being null, forcing the adopter to check again later. We should be able to avoid that.
Based on the discussion in the other thread, I think we should not merge this PR, and instead we should simply filter out |
We had a report that this is blocking generation for the Figma API: https://github.com/figma/rest-api-spec/blob/main/openapi/openapi.yaml, which I can confirm doesn't compile as-is. |
It would be great to get this merged as it unblocks using the Figma API as Simon mentions. |
I think we can't merge it as-is, as it'd be an API break. Plus, see my earlier message, I think we should fix this slightly differently. |
Motivation
OpenAPIKit's handling of
type: 'null'
was problematic with older Yams versions. See https://github.com/mattpolzin/OpenAPIKit/pull/366/files for a test demonstrating that & dependency version bump.Similarly, swift-openapi-generator explicitly does not "support"
type: 'null'
. As part of searching for something to address #513 I have added such support for explicit nulls. This gives one more sort of input schema where swift-openapi-generator produces some useful output instead of skipping a schema.Modifications
true
fromisSchemaSupported
fortype: 'null'
schemas..null
to have a builtint ype ofOpenAPIValueContainer
Result
Nothing should change for existing users because
type: null
schemas were previously unsupported. Going forward, usages of these schemas is supported.Test Plan
New test included.