-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OPENJPA-2817] dropping _transforming from PCClassFileTransformer and replace it by a minimal exclusion list #65
Open
rmannibucau
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
OPENJPA-2817_PCClassFileTransformer-exclusions
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this would likely trash our test classes too? They as well start with org.apache.openjpa...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I personally don't like code changes like this. Referencing hardcoded strings and doing numerous string comparisons/manipulation is kinda gross/hacky. All this complex string comparison is going to be pretty bad for performance when you have 100 persistence classes to transform and the have to be checked repeatedly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@struberg yes but it works cause we use build time enhancement - also probably why we didn't notice this issue earlier
@dazey3 as mentionned please benchmark it on the different kind of mentionned apps (no deps - jpa in the container, no deps + no tempclassloader - means temploader=apploader, lot of deps, lot of deps without temp loader, a few deps, a few deps without temp loader and you do the test without the javaagent or with it for all these cases). In practise this change is faster than most temploader usage and most bytecode reading so the assumption it is slower is not justified in the general case.