-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Arrow, AWS, Core: Remove deprecated code for 1.5.0 release #9505
Conversation
Can we combine this PR with other deprecations that should be removed before releasing 1.5.0? I think there aren't too many |
I don't want to combine #9298 with this change as it will be hard to review when we mix things. If there are direct removals, we can combine with this PR. I did a look up the remaining and only thing that is pending after this is deprecation from |
I didn't mean to combine it with #9298, but rather with any other deprecations that haven't been done yet. Searching through the codebase using |
Sure. |
Only thing left is deprecated code in |
I pushed the changed from AWS module as a separate commit in the same PR. |
import org.assertj.core.api.Assertions; | ||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
|
||
public class TestAwsProperties { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this being removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was testing only deprecated awsProperties.httpClientProperties()
. Since it is removed, There is no need of the test class.
Now we use HttpClientProperties
instead which is already covered by HttpClientPropertiesTest
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it seems the purpose of this test was to check that Kryo ser/de works. Therefore we should keep this test (although using non-deprecated properties)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok. Added a test to verify some basic properties.
No description provided.