-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flink: Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection #9452
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c153f38
Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection
gjacoby126 7428ec2
Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection
gjacoby126 4384e94
Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection
gjacoby126 adadc19
Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection
gjacoby126 bb8c50d
Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection
gjacoby126 428f367
Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection
gjacoby126 be5d3aa
Added error handling and default logic for Flink version detection
gjacoby126 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why don't we move the try-catch/null handling to an
initVersion
method?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stevenzwu - the cached value cannot be
static final String
because that will make the code untestable. (static final AtomicReference<String>
is fine, because its internal state is still mutable.) If it's not final, it cannot be namedVERSION
because the checkstyle config requires non-final static variables to be camelCased.The current implementation reflects @nastra and @pvary 's last suggestions -- @nastra 's suggestion to use AtomicReference and @pvary 's suggestion to consolidate to one function.
At this point we seem to have contradictory suggestions based on slightly different aesthetic preferences since no two people write code exactly the same. I'm fine implementing any of them, but I can't do all of them.
Is the current implementation ready for commit or can we come to a consensus on what needs to be done to get it ready?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure it is really necessary to add a unit test for the trivial change. anyway, this is fine to me. I will leave the style decision to @nastra and @pvary