Benchmark iteration test for binary 64 bit timer entries #43
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jcorporation
added a commit
to jcorporation/rax
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2022
This fixes the pull request antirez#43
|
I merged your patch in my rax fork that already merged patches from redis. Test does not compile and is fixed with jcorporation@f089a12. |
|
Sigh. Your fix doesn't work on my M1 Mac... I'll look at alternatives. |
|
Just merged your fix and it works! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Show iteration times for various instances of a simple model of timers similar to those used by Redis.
This is the first of 2 PRs. The 2nd PR has changes to iteration for which these new benchmarks provide useful comparisons.