-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: update ansys-dpf-core #3082
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying: @ansys-reviewer-bot review |
Just testing. |
Hopefully this has been addressed in the new version: ansys/pydpf-core#1438 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3082 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.94% 86.99% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 187 187
Lines 14622 14623 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 12713 12722 +9
+ Misses 1909 1901 -8 |
Still broken. @PProfizi |
Hi @germa89, Looking at the error, it seems you get the error linked to the change in operator naming for |
Hi @PProfizi Yes, it is a bit old. But I didn't have the time to figure it out how to deploy a newer version of DPF in our CICD. I know the docker registry I'm using hasn't been updated in 2 years. I'm happy to get some guidance on how to use newer versions of DPF in our CICD. |
Hi @germa89, do you necessarily need to go through the Docker registry? |
I do not need to go through the docker route. However, any proposed solution should work on github runners outside Ansys network. Do the action works in that way? |
Yes, we use it on GitHub runners outside of the Ansys network. It just needs access via a secret to a token to our DPF server repo. |
@PProfizi thank you a lot for this! I will start to work on this after next week. |
As the title.