Adding dynamic plots in documentation

[clatapie]

Closes #2177.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.92%. Comparing base (853daba) to head (5482de7).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2241      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.93%   86.92%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       14616    14619       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        12707    12708       +1     
- Misses       1909     1911       +2     

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[clatapie]

The following warning appears only one figure per output is supported for now when using the dynamic plotting.

EDIT: This can probably be modified as this example shows more than one dynamic figure

[clatapie]

The pyansys-math PR will be used as an example to implement it within PyMAPDL as there are some issues that are not solved for now.

[germa89]

Some questions need to be addressed, later please request another review.

[github-actions]

Hello! 👋

Your PR is changing the image cache. So I am attaching the new image cache
in a new commit.

This commit does not re-run the CICD workflows (since no changes are made in the codebase) therefore
you will see the actions showing in their status Expected — Waiting for status to be reported. Do not worry.
You commit workflow is still running here 😄

You might want to rerun the test to make sure that everything is passing. You can retrigger the CICD sending an empty commit git commit -m "Empty comment to trigger CICD" --allow-empty.

You will see this message everytime your commit changes the image cache but you are not attaching the updated cache. 🤓

[github-actions]

Hello! 👋

Your PR is changing the image cache. So I am attaching the new image cache
in a new commit.

This commit does not re-run the CICD workflows (since no changes are made in the codebase) therefore
you will see the actions showing in their status Expected — Waiting for status to be reported. Do not worry.
You commit workflow is still running here 😄

You might want to rerun the test to make sure that everything is passing. You can retrigger the CICD sending an empty commit git commit -m "Empty comment to trigger CICD" --allow-empty.

You will see this message everytime your commit changes the image cache but you are not attaching the updated cache. 🤓

[github-actions]

Hello! 👋

Your PR is changing the image cache. So I am attaching the new image cache
in a new commit.

This commit does not re-run the CICD workflows (since no changes are made in the codebase) therefore
you will see the actions showing in their status Expected — Waiting for status to be reported. Do not worry.
You commit workflow is still running here 😄

You might want to rerun the test to make sure that everything is passing. You can retrigger the CICD sending an empty commit git commit -m "Empty comment to trigger CICD" --allow-empty.

You will see this message everytime your commit changes the image cache but you are not attaching the updated cache. 🤓

[clatapie]

pyvista.DynamicScrapper doesn't correctly render for PyMAPDL for now because:

• there are different plots for 1 output and it's not yet accepted by the scrapper - easy to fix
• some .gif are generated - need to be investigated

[clatapie]

Pinging @AlejandroFernandezLuces for visibility.

[AlejandroFernandezLuces]

Christos is currently working in improving interactive documentation plotters. Here is his PR in case you want to try it out: pyvista/pyvista#4938

[germa89]

@clatapie can you write up a summarise of this PR situation?

[AlejandroFernandezLuces]

pyvista.DynamicScrapper doesn't correctly render for PyMAPDL for now because:

• there are different plots for 1 output and it's not yet accepted by the scrapper - easy to fix
• some .gif are generated - need to be investigated

Now the first one shouldn't happen, I've had to remove subplots from examples to adapt to the new visualization tool. Let me know if you need any help with this PR 🙂

[germa89]

Re-attempting this....