Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make prediction intervals name more robust for sktime #4283

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 18, 2023

Conversation

eccabay
Copy link
Contributor

@eccabay eccabay commented Aug 18, 2023

Closes #4281

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #4283 (539f974) into main (2ad46d3) will increase coverage by 49.7%.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main   #4283      +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage   50.1%   99.7%   +49.7%     
========================================
  Files        355     355              
  Lines      38956   38959       +3     
========================================
+ Hits       19490   38838   +19348     
+ Misses     19466     121   -19345     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
...omponents/estimators/regressors/arima_regressor.py 100.0% <100.0%> (+67.7%) ⬆️
...alml/tests/component_tests/test_arima_regressor.py 100.0% <100.0%> (+100.0%) ⬆️

... and 233 files with indirect coverage changes

@eccabay eccabay marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 19:30
@eccabay eccabay merged commit 24ba211 into main Aug 18, 2023
24 checks passed
@eccabay eccabay deleted the 4281_sktime-upgrade branch August 18, 2023 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Compatibility with sktime 0.22.0 and beyond
3 participants