-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
2f78ce5
commit a259740
Showing
1 changed file
with
14 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,2 +1,16 @@ | ||
# Spotify-Data-Analysis---RF-vs-MLP-Study | ||
The project involves using machine learning techniques, like RandomForestClassifier and MLP, to predict whether a song will be popular or not based on its acoustic features. The input consists of various acoustic and metadata features, while the output is a binary classification. | ||
|
||
|
||
We evaluate the accuracy using ROC curves and Precision-Recall curves on both MLP and RF and come to certain conclusions ,they are as follows: | ||
|
||
|
||
For Good Performance: | ||
|
||
If we want accurate and well-rounded results, go for the Random Forest model. It excels in precision and overall effectiveness. | ||
|
||
For Considering Interpretability and Efficiency: | ||
|
||
If we prioritize understanding the model or need efficient computing, think about the MLP model. We also have to be cautious about potential instability during convergence needs attention. | ||
|
||
Our choice should match what your task needs considering the trade-offs between accuracy, stability, and interpretability, especially in the Spotify dataset context. |