-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prefer require_relative for internal requires #939
Merged
tagliala
merged 1 commit into
activeadmin:master
from
tagliala:chore/prefer-require-relative
Sep 19, 2024
Merged
Prefer require_relative for internal requires #939
tagliala
merged 1 commit into
activeadmin:master
from
tagliala:chore/prefer-require-relative
Sep 19, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #939 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.92% 98.92%
=======================================
Files 14 14
Lines 557 557
=======================================
Hits 551 551
Misses 6 6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
deivid-rodriguez
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
`require_relative` is preferred over `require` for files within the same project because it uses paths relative to the current file, making code more portable and less dependent on the load path. This change updates internal requires to use `require_relative` for consistency, performance, and improved portability. Ref: - activeadmin/arbre#622
tagliala
force-pushed
the
chore/prefer-require-relative
branch
from
September 19, 2024 12:14
ede508a
to
e20fa1a
Compare
tagliala
added a commit
to tagliala/activeadmin
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2024
`require_relative` is preferred over `require` for files within the same project because it uses paths relative to the current file, making code more portable and less dependent on the load path. This change updates internal requires to use `require_relative` for consistency, performance, and improved portability. Ref: - activeadmin/arbre#622 - activeadmin/inherited_resources#939
tagliala
added a commit
to tagliala/activeadmin
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2024
`require_relative` is preferred over `require` for files within the same project because it uses paths relative to the current file, making code more portable and less dependent on the load path. This change updates internal requires to use `require_relative` for consistency, performance, and improved portability. Ref: - activeadmin/arbre#622 - activeadmin/inherited_resources#939
tagliala
added a commit
to tagliala/activeadmin
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2024
`require_relative` is preferred over `require` for files within the same project because it uses paths relative to the current file, making code more portable and less dependent on the load path. This change updates internal requires to use `require_relative` for consistency, performance, and improved portability. Ref: - activeadmin/arbre#622 - activeadmin/inherited_resources#939
tagliala
added a commit
to tagliala/activeadmin
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2024
`require_relative` is preferred over `require` for files within the same project because it uses paths relative to the current file, making code more portable and less dependent on the load path. This change updates internal requires to use `require_relative` for consistency, performance, and improved portability. Ref: - activeadmin/arbre#622 - activeadmin/inherited_resources#939
tagliala
added a commit
to activeadmin/activeadmin
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
`require_relative` is preferred over `require` for files within the same project because it uses paths relative to the current file, making code more portable and less dependent on the load path. This change updates internal requires to use `require_relative` for consistency, performance, and improved portability. Ref: - activeadmin/arbre#622 - activeadmin/inherited_resources#939
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
require_relative
is preferred overrequire
for files within the same project because it uses paths relative to the current file, making code more portable and less dependent on the load path.This change updates internal requires to use
require_relative
for consistency, performance, and improved portability.Ref:
require_relative
for internal requires arbre#622