You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
thank you for the tool! I had been trying it out and it seems to work fine, but was wondering whether there was a possibility to add labels for each of the samples supplied in --b1? From what I understand from the existing options, when you provide --b1 you have to provide --l1, which then gives all of them a label (e.g "Sample1") and increments this label for each of the provided samples (e.g "Sample1-1", "Sample1-2"). I am trying to achieve that instead of incrementing it based upon --l1 I can instead provide a list of names to be used as the label (same index/order as the input files). Would that be possible?
EDIT:
Found a possible solution just by creating a --group-info where an individual label is given for each sample/index, hadn't thought of that before. I'll close the issue (but will leave it here in case people might search for the same thing).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
thank you for the tool! I had been trying it out and it seems to work fine, but was wondering whether there was a possibility to add labels for each of the samples supplied in
--b1
? From what I understand from the existing options, when you provide--b1
you have to provide--l1
, which then gives all of them a label (e.g "Sample1") and increments this label for each of the provided samples (e.g "Sample1-1", "Sample1-2"). I am trying to achieve that instead of incrementing it based upon--l1
I can instead provide a list of names to be used as the label (same index/order as the input files). Would that be possible?EDIT:
Found a possible solution just by creating a
--group-info
where an individual label is given for each sample/index, hadn't thought of that before. I'll close the issue (but will leave it here in case people might search for the same thing).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: