Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defer GC subgroup topic #520

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Defer GC subgroup topic #520

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

rossberg
Copy link
Member

Unfortunately, I can't attend tomorrow due to a family incident, so I'm pushing the item to the next meeting.

Unfortunately, I can't attend tomorrow due to a family incident, so I'm pushing the item to the next meeting.
@RossTate
Copy link
Contributor

Given that this is purely organizational and was already deferred from the in-person meeting, could someone like @lukewagner not take this discussion over so that we can get the momentum building?

@binji
Copy link
Member

binji commented Mar 16, 2020

I agree that this is mostly organizational. Do we need to have any discussion more than agreeing to create the subgroup?

@dtig
Copy link
Member

dtig commented Mar 16, 2020

Perhaps we should discuss this offline instead of at a meeting? I suspect the forming of the subgroup itself is non-contentious, but there may be open items to discuss regarding the details of the charter. Are there any objections to cancelling this meeting and discussing the details in an issue? That way we can possibly make progress without waiting the additional two weeks, and @rossberg can also chime in asynchronously when possible.

@RossTate
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm, I guess the question is how do we determine who wants to be involved, either in the subgroup or in hashing out whatever details need to be resolved to form a subgroup? (I do not know the subgroup process, so I have no idea what those details are.)

@binji
Copy link
Member

binji commented Mar 16, 2020

Generally anyone who wants to be involved can be. There is no official subgroup process, but the way we've done it in the past is to have a charter, and separate meetings for that group. In essence it's primarily a way to have more focused discussions.

@RossTate
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good. I realized I should have said earlier that I have no objection; I am just wondering as a newcomer how we invite people to get involved.

@binji
Copy link
Member

binji commented Mar 17, 2020

I am just wondering as a newcomer how we invite people to get involved.

All they have to do is join the CG, then they can be involved. With other subgroups we've had regular (usually every two weeks) meetings, I'd suggest we do the same here. See, for example, the interface types meetings or simd meetings.

@binji
Copy link
Member

binji commented Mar 17, 2020

I've created an issue here to discuss. In the meantime, let's cancel tomorrow's meeting.

@dtig
Copy link
Member

dtig commented Mar 17, 2020

Thanks Ben, leaving a link here to the debugging subgroup meetings as well. Meeting tomorrow is now cancelled.

@dtig dtig merged commit dca9ad1 into master Mar 17, 2020
@dtig dtig deleted the rossberg-patch-1 branch March 17, 2020 00:27
@RossTate
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for all the links and filing the issue to get things going! I'll get reading to catch up :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants