Corporea string item loading is done client-side

[gamma-delta]

This closes #4248 and also has some other nice effects:

• We no longer load the I18n on the server (which shouldn't be happening anyways, strictly speaking)
• Players in different languages can now request items in their language (tested, but the special-cased stack of and such are still Englishy)
• Requesting this now uses a CorporeaItemStackMatcher instead of searching for the name of the item

I've done some tests and the following works:

• Requesting items in various different languages
• Intercepting foreign-language requests
• Maintaining foreign language requests across lang changes:
  • Request 64 stone with nothing in the system
  • Have an interceptor get it
  • Switch language to Toki Pona
  • Put stone in the system and replay the request with the retainer, and it arrives
  • Do the same in reverse; requesting 64 kiwen in Toki Pona gives you the stone after switching back to English

Todo:

• Check you can request items with custom names
• Check keybind requests still work
• Check that intercepted requests from old versions still work when loaded (I made some changes to the storage format and added a legacy check to still try its best; is this a goal we need to test?)

[gamma-delta]

whoops I very cleverly put backticks in the last commit name so it tried to interpret them as commands. it should say "make matching this use NBT in the same way the c keybind does"

[gamma-delta]

Say I have an iron ingot in the system called Foobar. If I request an iron ingot, is it expected behavior to recieve the renamed ingot?

(I'll run spotless at the end)

[gamma-delta]

One problem I thought of: it won't work nicely with items that have a different display name per stack irregardless of the display name, like hexcasting scrolls...

[artemisSystem]

Check that intercepted requests from old versions still work when loaded (I made some changes to the storage format and added a legacy check to still try its best; is this a goal we need to test?)

Yes, i'd say this is a goal. Currently not feeling very well but if i get better in the next few days i can test whether it works currently

One problem I thought of: it won't work nicely with items that have a different display name per stack irregardless of the display name, like hexcasting scrolls...

Can you rephrase? I don't get what you mean

Say I have an iron ingot in the system called Foobar. If I request an iron ingot, is it expected behavior to recieve the renamed ingot?

I think you already got the answer to this but, for posterity: No, it shouldn't return the renamed item.

[Alwinfy]

One problem I thought of: it won't work nicely with items that have a different display name per stack irregardless of the display name, like hexcasting scrolls...

Can you rephrase? I don't get what you mean

Consider an item that changes its display name by its NBT, such as a fluid tank that may be named "Empty Tank" or "Tank of {X liquid}"

[TheRealWormbo]

Can anything from this PR be salvaged?