Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed field override on telegram serializer #655

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

alimaktabi
Copy link
Collaborator

@alimaktabi alimaktabi commented Oct 31, 2024

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Fix field override issue in the Telegram serializer by adding a method to determine connection status.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The PR adds a new method to handle the connection status in the Telegram serializer. The implementation is straightforward, with a simple getter method that always returns True for the is_connected field.

Updated class diagram for Telegram serializer

classDiagram
    class TelegramSerializer {
        +validate_address(raise_exception: bool) bool
        +get_is_connected(obj) bool
    }
    note for TelegramSerializer "Added get_is_connected method returning True"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added a new getter method for the is_connected field in the serializer
  • Implemented get_is_connected method that always returns True
  • Method follows Django REST Framework's serializer field override convention
telegram/serializers.py

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@alimaktabi alimaktabi merged commit be9919f into develop Oct 31, 2024
1 check passed
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @alimaktabi - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Both validate_address() and get_is_connected() unconditionally return True. Please implement proper validation and connection state checking logic, or explain why these simplistic implementations are correct.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@@ -14,3 +14,6 @@ class Meta:

def validate_address(self, raise_exception=False):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue: The raise_exception parameter is not being used in the implementation

Either implement the exception raising functionality or remove the unused parameter

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant