Issue #2112 - Creates comparing testing frameworks outline

testing-and-tdd/compared-testing-frameworks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+# Comparing Testing Frameworks
+
+**Projected Time**
+
+Example: 30-45 minutes
+
+- Lesson: ? min
+- Guided Practice: ?-? min
+- Independent Practice: ? min
+- Check for Understanding: ?-? min
+
+**Prerequisites**
+
+Here are topics that should be understood before this topic:
+
+- Example: [Git version control](https://github.com/Techtonica/curriculum/blob/efc365aba1bf1ea425060369751d2bc048174b22/git/git-version-control.md)
+
+**Motivation**
+
+Why it is worth learning this topic
+
+- Older versions of section included companies using the tech - this is not helpful and tends to get laughably outdated
+- Include links to future lessons/work this will help with - this will plant the seed later
+- How does fit this tool fit into the ecosystem or full stack architecture? (if applicable)
+- If a fellow engineer asked about this tool/technique, what would your succinct answer be?
+
+**Objectives**
+
+**Participants will be able to:**
+
+- Differentiate between testing frameworks (e.g., RTL, Jest, Vitest, Supertest, etc.)
+- Understand the various use cases for each testing framework
+
+**Specific Things To Learn**
+
+  - What is the difference between unit and integration testing?
+  - What makes up a test suite?
+
+**Materials**
+
+- [Example video (10 min)](https://google.com/) - Write a very short description of this resource.
+- [Other example article(20 min read)](https://google.com/) - Answer the 3 questions at the end. (Be sure to explain how to use these materials in directions in one of the sections below (ie: lesson, guided practice). If you are not assigning them somehow, they should be placed under Supplemental Materials at the bottom.)
+
+**Lesson**
+
+Here's text about introducing something and how it works.
+
+- [Be sure to link the slideshow, video,](https://google.com/)
+- [or other materials you expect them to follow as part of the lesson.](https://google.com/)
+
+Build on the first information. Have participants make guesses, do an activity, etc.
+
+Make sure to mention these things:
+
+- Things - This is a sub-thing
+- More things
+- Even more things
+- Even more things
+
+**Common Mistakes & Misconceptions**
+
+List things that learners might not realize, might assume at first, or should avoid.
+
+- Example
+- Example
+
+**Guided Practice**
+
+Have the participants work with you as you do something step-by-step. This can also be fulfilled by a detailed tutorial intended for beginners.
+
+**Independent Practice**
+
+Class does this thing themselves with specific additional items. This could be alone, with a partner, or small group; but the idea is that it's less guided, more independent.
+
+**Challenge**
+
+Participants can try to do this other thing. Ideally, they will be challenged to connect what they've learned to some previous knowledge or additional research.
+
+**Check for Understanding**
+
+Some ideas: have participants summarize to each other, make a cheat sheet, take a quiz, do an assignment, or something else that helps them self-assess their understanding. This exercise should help participants determine whether they've met the outline objectives, or if they need to review.ss
+
+**Supplemental Materials**
+
+- 🎦 [Intro to Jest: Object & API Testing](https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/anmkgxuntp8uvlyduzpic/IntroToJestObject-ApiTesting.mp4?rlkey=smzcsizwb1legmhml4xolc72h&dl=0)
+- 🎦 [Jest Super Test Integration API Request Testing](https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/94h7u58t27zj55teusajo/JestSupertestIntegrationApiRequestTesting.mp4?rlkey=bap50gvtjsmxjt0gasczg3d7a&dl=0) with volunteer Cristina Rodriguez (she/her)
+
+### Type of problem
+
+It may not be clear to participants when to use the various testing frameworks.