Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: tup-463 c-content-block and generics/attributes from tup-ui #246

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

wesleyboar
Copy link
Member

@wesleyboar wesleyboar commented Oct 13, 2023

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feature A new feature or replacement of existing feature label Oct 13, 2023
@wesleyboar wesleyboar added the minor A feature in backward-compatible manner label Oct 13, 2023
@wesleyboar wesleyboar marked this pull request as draft October 13, 2023 16:10
@wesleyboar wesleyboar changed the title feat: new patterns and fixes from tup-ui feat: tup-463 migrate core-… css Oct 13, 2023
wesleyboar and others added 3 commits October 13, 2023 11:24
* added generics/attributes to demo

* added disabled attr pointer-events to generics/attributes

---------

Co-authored-by: Wesley B <[email protected]>
* feat: tup-610 content-block migration

* quick fix, moved import from base to cms

* moved import from base to cms

* delete dist file for content-block

---------

Co-authored-by: Wesley B <[email protected]>
@wesleyboar wesleyboar changed the title feat: tup-463 migrate core-… css feat: tup-463 c-content-block and generics/attributes from tup-ui Oct 13, 2023
@wesleyboar wesleyboar marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2023 19:17
@wesleyboar wesleyboar merged commit 4249947 into main Oct 13, 2023
@wesleyboar wesleyboar deleted the feat/tup-463 branch October 13, 2023 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature A new feature or replacement of existing feature minor A feature in backward-compatible manner
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants