Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix thrift RuntimeProfile child node number not consistent #54837

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

banmoy
Copy link
Contributor

@banmoy banmoy commented Jan 8, 2025

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #9080

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.4
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0

Signed-off-by: PengFei Li <[email protected]>
@banmoy banmoy requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 08:38
@mergify mergify bot assigned banmoy Jan 8, 2025
@banmoy banmoy changed the title [BugFix] Fix RuntimeProfile::to_thrift contention problem [BugFix] Fix RuntimeProfile::to_thrift child node number contention problem Jan 8, 2025
@banmoy banmoy changed the title [BugFix] Fix RuntimeProfile::to_thrift child node number contention problem [BugFix] Fix RuntimeProfile::to_thrift child node number contention Jan 8, 2025
@banmoy banmoy changed the title [BugFix] Fix RuntimeProfile::to_thrift child node number contention [BugFix] Fix RuntimeProfile::to_thrift child node number not consistent Jan 8, 2025
@banmoy banmoy changed the title [BugFix] Fix RuntimeProfile::to_thrift child node number not consistent [BugFix] Fix thrift RuntimeProfile child node number not consistent Jan 8, 2025
Signed-off-by: PengFei Li <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 2 / 2 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 be/src/util/runtime_profile.cpp 2 2 100.00% []

@kevincai kevincai merged commit ba7737d into StarRocks:main Jan 9, 2025
48 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.4

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.4 label Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.2 label Jan 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 9, 2025

backport branch-3.4

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 9, 2025

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 9, 2025

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants