Explain Ruby Sorbet's inclusion more clearly #564
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
st0012
force-pushed
the
st0012-patch-1
branch
from
a7b230c to
c1376c7
Compare
vinistock
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2023
Co-authored-by: Vinicius Stock <[email protected]>
paracycle
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To non-Sorbet users, the current mentioning of
Ruby Sorbetmay be interpreted as "we expect you to use Sorbet too", which is definitely not correct. I think we can explain its inclusion more clearly to reduce confusion.