Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AE] Add/Restructure Olfactory Arts Categories #356

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ricardotejedorsanz
Copy link
Contributor

Following suggestions on issue #221, we are expanding the Arts & Entertainment area to include missing categories related to Olfactory Arts:

Arts & Entertainment
↳ Hobbies & Creative Arts
⚪️ ↳ Arts & Crafts
⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Art & Craft Kits
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Candle Making Kits
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Incense Making Kits
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Perfume Making Kits [NEW]
[...]

⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Art & Crafting Materials
[...]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Olfactory Arts Materials [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Fragrance Ingredients [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Bases [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Natural Ingredients [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Synthetic Ingredients [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Candle Making Materials [NEW]

⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Raw Candle Wax
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Beeswax
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Gel Wax
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Palm Wax
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Paraffin
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Soy Wax
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Wick Tabs
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Metal Wick Tabs
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Pre-Tabbed Wick Tabs
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Self-Adhesive Wick Tabs
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Wicks
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Pre-Waxed Wicks

⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Art & Crafting Tools
[...]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Olfactory Arts Tools [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Candle Making Tools [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Incense Making Tools [NEW]
⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ⚪️ ↳ Perfume Making Tools [NEW]


We have also added applicable attributes, including:

Attribute name Values
Perfume kit items included Beaker,Bottles,Eye-droppers,Filter paper,Funnel,Magnet bars,Magnetic stirrer,Measuring scale,Perfume labels,Pipettes,Plain caps,Scent strip holders,Scent strips,Spatula,Stirring rods,Other
Fragrance base type Alcohol,Emulsifier,Gel,Glycerin,Oil,Silicone,Water,Wax,Other
Fragrance family Aldehydic,Animalic,Aquatic,Aromatic,Balsamic,Chypre,Citrus,Earthy,Eccentric,Floral,Fougere,Fresh,Fruity,Gourmand,Green,Herbal,Leather,Musky,Oriental,Powdery,Resinous,Spicy,Woody,Other
Concentration Diluted,Pure
Perfume note type Base,Base to middle,Middle,Middle to top,Top
Perfume note function Accent,Base Enhancer,Blender,Bridge,Enhancer,Fixative,Heart enhancer,Modifier,Top enhancer,Other

image
image
image
image
image

@ricardotejedorsanz ricardotejedorsanz changed the title [A&E] Add/Restructure Olfactory Arts Categories [AE] Add/Restructure Olfactory Arts Categories Oct 2, 2024
@contrebande-labs
Copy link

Hi! This is really nice to hear that you have made progress! On our shop, we have created an even more detailed taxonomy for the ingredients. It is part of an as of yet unreleased search engine based on Shopify instead of Algolia. We have not released it yet. But it includes very fundamental aspects such as: physical form (liquid, solid, slurry), color, etc. Let me get back to you early next week with full comments. Also, in our case, the synthetic/natural is not part of the taxonomy but is rather a property because this is very contencious, we call it the "pathway" (this means "how it was obtained").

@contrebande-labs
Copy link

contrebande-labs commented Oct 10, 2024

Hi guys, here are my comments:

  • Synthetic vs Natural: this is a very, very, very contentious issue because no consensus exists on a definition of "natural". Some argue that if a molecular species can be found in nature, any of its enantiomers is "natural", even when a specific product is obtained via an in-vitro chemical reaction. Further more who's to say in-vitro reactions based on enzymatic processes that occur in nature, sometimes involving the exact same micro-organisms, are not themselves natural? This distinction has been enabling a lot of fraud since the industrial revolution and this taxonomy is an opportunity to fix this. We strongly suggest to merge the two taxonomy nodes as one and move this dimension/facet/aspect as a value/property instead. We propose "pathway" for the property name with two possible values: "natural" or "synthetic". And the description for the two possible values is as follow: "natural" is used when the substance is obtained solely by physical separation (distillation, tincturing, expression, etc.) from biomass (matter harvested, culled, secreted from/by living organisms) and absolutely no chemical reaction has occured at any time during the extraction. "Synthetic" is anything else;
  • Perfume kit items included: Instead of "perfume", "perfumery" should be used. And instead of "items", one should use "instruments" because that's the term in common usage to refer to anything else than ingredients. You could also simply say "Instruments included". We should have "spray caps" and/or "spray pumps" and/or "sprayers" and/or "flacons" (flacons are decorative containers used to store the finished perfume blend and "bottles" are for WIP substances, incredients, bases, etc.);
  • Fragrance base type: "base" refers to something very specific in perfumery and should not be used for anything else. What you list as possible values for this property are called "additives" and are any "solvent", "solubilizer", "stabilizer" added to a perfume ingredients. And the list is very long before we get to "others". I could provide suggestions for this if you want. Also, the solvent is usually considered seperately. See "concentration" below.
  • Fragrance family: this is very subjective and varies from one retailer to the other. As for "synthetic" vs "natural", there is absolutely no concensus on this. But unlike the "synthetic" vs "natural", it's not a binary property and it should not be formalized for it to be useable. For instence Amazon has tried it and it's a mess: it confuses more than it helps. And we don't use "fragrance" for "ingredient", we use "olfactory". So it's "olfactory" family.
  • Concentration: nothing, absolutely nothing is ever "pure". But not everything is "diluted". Usually, this is an optional facet: with the "percent" dilution and an acronym for solvent is specified: 10% SDA (specially denaturated alcohol), 1% DPG (dipropylene glycol). So there is a "concentration" part and a "solvent" part. And it's called "solution". And when it's not been diluted, it's left blank.
  • Perfume note type: this is called "volatility". Sometimes it's described as you put it: base, middle/heart, top. But it's also sometimes and more accurately described as how long you can smell it on a paper strip: N seconds, N minutes, N hours, N days, N weeks, N months. Base, middle, top are more marketing terms used to describe perfumes and are less relevant for perfume ingredients;
  • Perfume note function: this simply should be left to the description or as custom metafields because it's even more subjective and non-descriptive as the other aspects above;
  • CAS Number: you didn't put it as a property, but it MUST be there. Everything from essential oils to single molecules have CAS numbers and it's the only universal way to unambiguously refer to a perfumery incredient. Bases or new ingredients (sometimes only temporarily) don't have a CAS Registry Number and "Not Available" and "Not Applicable" should also be valid values on top of the formal regex-able CAS number. But this is an absolute must.

I'm available to consult for free on this but please, please let's do this right!

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2025-01 taxonomy-tree-requests Suggestion to improve to the taxonomy tree
Projects
None yet
3 participants