Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Javascript Example to Selenium Manager #1968

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shbenzer
Copy link
Contributor

@shbenzer shbenzer commented Sep 24, 2024

User description

Added Javascript example to Selenium Manager docs

Description

added usage.spec.js
integrated examples into all translations of Selenium Manager's index.md

Motivation and Context

make website more comprehensive

Types of changes

  • Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
  • Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
  • Improved translation
  • Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing document.
  • I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

PR Type

Documentation, Tests


Description

  • Added a new JavaScript test file usage.spec.js for Selenium Manager, demonstrating usage before and after integration.
  • Updated documentation in multiple languages (English, Japanese, Portuguese, Chinese) to include the JavaScript example.
  • Enhanced the comprehensiveness of the Selenium Manager documentation by providing practical code snippets.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Tests
usage.spec.js
Add JavaScript test cases for Selenium Manager usage         

examples/javascript/test/selenium_manager/usage.spec.js

  • Added a new JavaScript test file for Selenium Manager.
  • Implemented two test cases: one for usage after Selenium Manager and
    one before.
  • Utilized Selenium WebDriver for browser automation.
  • +34/-0   
    Documentation
    selenium_manager.en.md
    Update English documentation with JavaScript example         

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/selenium_manager.en.md

  • Integrated JavaScript example into the English documentation.
  • Provided code snippets for usage before and after Selenium Manager.
  • +5/-2     
    selenium_manager.ja.md
    Update Japanese documentation with JavaScript example       

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/selenium_manager.ja.md

  • Integrated JavaScript example into the Japanese documentation.
  • Provided code snippets for usage before and after Selenium Manager.
  • +5/-2     
    selenium_manager.pt-br.md
    Update Portuguese documentation with JavaScript example   

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/selenium_manager.pt-br.md

  • Integrated JavaScript example into the Portuguese documentation.
  • Provided code snippets for usage before and after Selenium Manager.
  • +5/-2     
    selenium_manager.zh-cn.md
    Update Chinese documentation with JavaScript example         

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/selenium_manager.zh-cn.md

  • Integrated JavaScript example into the Chinese documentation.
  • Provided code snippets for usage before and after Selenium Manager.
  • +5/-2     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    netlify bot commented Sep 24, 2024

    👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

    Visit the deploys page to approve it

    Name Link
    🔨 Latest commit 908c297

    @qodo-merge-pro qodo-merge-pro bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation tests Review effort [1-5]: 2 labels Sep 24, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Error Handling
    The test cases lack proper error handling and assertions. Consider adding try-catch blocks and assertions to ensure the tests are robust and informative.

    Code Duplication
    There's some code duplication between the two test cases. Consider refactoring common setup and teardown operations into before() and after() hooks.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Implement error handling and ensure proper resource cleanup in WebDriver usage

    Consider using a try-catch block to handle potential errors when creating and using
    the WebDriver. This will ensure proper error handling and resource cleanup.

    examples/javascript/test/selenium_manager/usage.spec.js [9-14]

    -let driver = new Builder()
    -    .forBrowser(Browser.CHROME)
    -    .build();
    +let driver;
    +try {
    +  driver = await new Builder()
    +      .forBrowser(Browser.CHROME)
    +      .build();
    +  await driver.get('https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/blank.html');
    +} catch (error) {
    +  console.error('Error occurred:', error);
    +} finally {
    +  if (driver) await driver.quit();
    +}
     
    -await driver.get('https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/blank.html');
    -await driver.quit();
    -
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: The suggestion to use a try-catch block for error handling and resource cleanup is crucial for robust test execution, ensuring that resources are properly released even if an error occurs.

    9
    Enhancement
    Use async/await consistently for better asynchronous code handling

    Use async/await consistently throughout the test cases for better readability and
    error handling.

    examples/javascript/test/selenium_manager/usage.spec.js [18-29]

    -let paths = getBinaryPaths(options)
    -let driverPath = paths.driverPath;
    -let browserPath = paths.browserPath;
    +const paths = await getBinaryPaths(options);
    +const driverPath = paths.driverPath;
    +const browserPath = paths.browserPath;
     
    -options.setChromeBinaryPath(browserPath)
    +options.setChromeBinaryPath(browserPath);
     
    -let service = new Chrome.ServiceBuilder().setPath(driverPath)
    +const service = new Chrome.ServiceBuilder().setPath(driverPath);
     
    -let driver = new Builder()
    +const driver = await new Builder()
         .forBrowser(Browser.CHROME)
         .setChromeService(service)
         .build();
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Consistent use of async/await improves code readability and ensures proper handling of asynchronous operations, which is important for maintaining clean and understandable code.

    8
    Possible issue
    Add a timeout to page load operations to prevent indefinite waiting

    Consider adding a timeout to the driver.get() calls to prevent tests from hanging
    indefinitely if the page doesn't load.

    examples/javascript/test/selenium_manager/usage.spec.js [13]

    -await driver.get('https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/blank.html');
    +await driver.get('https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/blank.html', 10000);
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding a timeout to the driver.get() calls is a good practice to prevent tests from hanging indefinitely, although the specific method to set a timeout may need verification as it might not be directly supported by the WebDriver API.

    7

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    Copy link

    @A1exKH A1exKH left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    LGTM.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Review effort [1-5]: 2 tests
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants