Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct SVM Use #346

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 2, 2024
Merged

Correct SVM Use #346

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c3897a3
Correct SVM Use
LouisAUTHIE Oct 29, 2024
011b52f
Update OneClassSVM.php
LouisAUTHIE Oct 30, 2024
851df84
Update OneClassSVM.php
LouisAUTHIE Nov 1, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 16 additions & 2 deletions src/AnomalyDetectors/OneClassSVM.php
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ public function __construct(
new ExtensionIsLoaded('svm'),
new ExtensionMinimumVersion('svm', '0.2.0'),
])->check();


if ($nu < 0.0 or $nu > 1.0) {
throw new InvalidArgumentException('Nu must be between'
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -182,7 +183,14 @@ public function train(Dataset $dataset) : void
new SamplesAreCompatibleWithEstimator($dataset, $this),
])->check();

$this->model = $this->svm->train($dataset->samples());
$data = [];

foreach ($dataset->samples() as $sample) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So did array_unshift() turn out to be faster?

Is it necessary to assign the sample to an intermediate variable or would

foreach ($dataset->samples() as $sample) {
    array_unshift($sample, 1);

    $data[] = $sample;
}

work here as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is faster yes. And the rest works also, please see the next commit

array_unshift($sample, 1);
$data[] = $sample;
}

$this->model = $this->svm->train($data);
}

/**
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -211,7 +219,13 @@ public function predictSample(array $sample) : int
throw new RuntimeException('Estimator has not been trained.');
}

return $this->model->predict($sample) !== 1.0 ? 0 : 1;
$sampleWithOffset = [];

foreach ($sample as $key => $value) {
$sampleWithOffset[$key + 1] = $value;
}

return $this->model->predict($sampleWithOffset) == 1 ? 0 : 1;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I notice we are "inversing" the logic here i.e. 1 is now 0, 0 is now 1. Is that intentional?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, in fact in the one class mode of libsvm, the "normal" samples are to be labelled with the 1 class. And the anomalies, are to be labelled with -1. That's why !

}

/**
Expand Down
Loading